Publicado el

What Does It Mean for Law (Or Crime) to Be Relative across Time and Space

Criminal Social Control A means of social control that prohibits certain social behaviours and responds to violations with punitive burden theory, which deals with the relationship between socially acceptable goals and socially acceptable means of achieving those goals Bromley, R. D. F. and Nelson, A. L. (2002) “Alcohol-related crime and disturbance in urban space and time: Evidence from a British City,” Geoforum, 33: 239-254. A second series of articles examines more aggregated time units to understand spatio-temporal patterns of crime. Andresen and Malleson explore spatio-temporal patterns by time of day and day of the week; Tompson and Bowers study how weather and seasonality affect the timing and location of street robberies. and Malleson and Andresen tackle the problem of crime risk using the surrounding population. The underlying vulnerable population is itself dynamic, changes in time and space, and is not well represented by the use of the resident population as the denominator of crime. Although we all violate the norms from time to time, few people would consider themselves deviants.

Often, however, those who do gradually believe they are deviant because they have been labeled “deviant” by society. Labeling theory examines the attribution of deviant behavior of another person by members of society. Thus, what is considered deviant is not so much determined by the behaviors themselves or the people who commit them, but by the reactions of others to those behaviors. As a result, what is considered deviant changes over time and can vary greatly from culture to culture. As Becker said, “Deviance is not a property of the action the person commits, but a consequence of the application of rules and sanctions by others to the perpetrator. The deviant is someone to whom the label has been successfully affixed; Deviant behavior is a behavior that humans call it” (1963). Since the girl was willing to do household chores in place of the man`s ex-wife, the judge assumed that she was also willing to have sex. To address such issues, feminists have successfully urged the Supreme Court to issue decisions restricting a defense lawyer`s access to a victim`s medical and counseling records, and the rules of evidence have been changed to prevent a woman`s sexual history from being used against her. Consent to sexual speech has been redefined as what a woman actually says or does, not as what the man thinks is consent. Feminists have also argued that attacks on spouses are a key element of patriarchal power. Typically, it was hidden in the household and was widely regarded as a private and domestic matter in which the police were reluctant to intervene.

Felson, M. and E. Poulsen (2003) “Simple indicators of crime by time of day”, International Journal of Forecasting 19: 595 – 601. Felson and Boivín provided the framework for this thematic issue and examined traffic data to determine how daily spatio-temporal changes in population affect a city`s crime. The premise here is that daily movements in a city follow a funnel assumption; and that visitors will have a greater impact on crime than residents. While the data do not allow for a microscopic breakdown of crime by time and location, the results show that daily visitors have a significant impact on the distribution of violence and property crime relative to residents. This suggests that daily spatio-temporal changes have a greater influence on the distribution of crime opportunities in urban areas than fixed housing factors. The sociological study of crime, deviance and social control is particularly important in public policy debates. In 2012, the Conservative government passed the Safe Streets and Communities Act, a controversial law because it introduced mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug and sexual offences, the use of conditional sentences (i.e. Non-custodial sentences), imposed harsher sentences on certain categories of young offenders, limiting the ability of Canadians with criminal records to obtain a pardon. and it was difficult for Canadians detained abroad to return to a Canadian prison to be closer to their families and support networks.

For example, the law provides for a mandatory six-month prison sentence for growing six marijuana plants. This followed the Tackling Violent Crime Act, 2008, which provided, among other things, for a mandatory three-year prison sentence for first-time firearms offences. Many of Chicago`s old ideas from the 1930s and 1940s no longer apply. Areas identified as high crime areas have low and moderate crime rates in cities during certain periods in several of their streets/blocks. Some areas are vulnerable to certain crimes at certain times of the day, but it is rare to analyze whether these areas suffer from other types of crime at the same time or at another time or day of the week. In addition, little attention is paid to explaining the dynamics of crime hotspots. Crime can change rapidly over the course of 168 hours (1 week). In addition, and particularly in the case of mixed land use, the characteristics of these populations are likely to differ significantly from those of the resident population, making it difficult to calculate realistic crime rates. Are these changes solely driven by population dynamics, how is population affected by the physical and social composition of the environments in which these crimes take place, and what motivates this change? The objective of this thematic issue is to bring together a series of articles on crime trends over time and space in order to examine the dynamics of crime opportunities in urban areas. Émile Durkheim believed that deviance is a necessary part of a prosperous society. One way deviance is functional, he argued, is that it challenges people`s current views (1893).

For example, when black students in the United States participated in “sit-ins” during the civil rights movement, they challenged notions of segregation in society. In addition, Durkheim noted that when deviance is punished, it reinforces current social norms that also contribute to society (1893). Seeing a student jailed for skipping classes reminds other high school students that playing Hooky is not allowed and that they, too, could be jailed. Over the past two decades, the analysis of the spatial distribution of crime has expanded considerably, with small- and micro-scale analysis at the forefront of location-based research (Sherman et al., 1989; Sherman, 1995; Weisburd, 2015). This trend is attributable both to the increasing availability of spatially referenced crime data and to technological advances in software products that support spatial clustering of crime analysis or hotspot analysis. However, this growth in spatial analysis may not translate into similar advances in temporal crime analysis. Although a number of studies have examined temporal trends in crime (Ashby and Bowers, 2013), these are not as important as the space literature in this area. As more than 10 years ago, when spatial analysis of crime has flourished, analysis of the temporal distribution of crime has not kept pace (Ratcliffe, 2002). This is still true today; “The majority of studies linking potentially criminogenic locations to increased crime rates in geographic units were temporal” (Haberman and Ratcliffe in press). The movement depends on the type of hot spot where the procedure takes place. Intervention in crime generators` hotspots is unlikely to lead to crime suppression, as the crimes that occur there are opportunistic. Evictions from crime attractor hotspots are much more likely and can be summarized in three limited statements: First, criminal activity in crime attractors is likely to be moved to the neighborhood around the attractor if there are attractive targets or victims nearby.

Second, criminal activity that cannot move to the neighborhood around the original attractor is likely to be moved to other key attractor nodes. Third, criminal activity that cannot be moved to the neighborhood around the original attractor and into another major crime attractor is likely to be moved to the offender`s home neighborhood rather than to neighborhoods adjacent and similar to the neighborhood of the crime attractor. This is a function of the interaction of spaces of consciousness with urban form.